Contribution Guidelines
1. All papers should be written in English and must not be less than 4 pages in length. If your paper exceeds 6 pages in length, you need to pay for the additional pages.

2. Send the full paper(word+pdf) to Online Submission System or via Email: iceeic@126.com, before the submission deadline.

3. Please mark “submission + contact number” when you submit papers via Email.

4. Download paper template.

5. Submissions will be peer-reviewed based on originality, technical quality and presentation.

6, All submissions will be checked for reference authenticity. Please ensure each reference is verifiable via its DOI or a working link.

7. Crosscheck Powered by iThenticate will be used for plagiarism and AI check. The amount of duplication from previously published content and AI rate detection should be less than 20%; If the amount of duplication and AI rate detection is 20% - 30%, modification maybe required; If the repetition rate and AI rate detection results both exceed 30%, the article will be rejecte

Editorial Policy
Step-1: Submit Manuscript     

When you submit a manuscript, an e-mail confirmation from the editor or editorial assistant will be sent to the corresponding author within 3 working days. If you fail to receive this confirmation, please contact the editorial assistant by iceeic@126.com

Step-2. Plagiarism Check
To keep scientific integrity, one of our editors will run iThenticate on each new submission to check if it has a potential problem of plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism check will be desk rejected immediately.

Step-3:  Preliminary Review    
The topic of manuscript must be included in the conference's aim and scope. Then, the similarity rate checking will be done. Manuscripts out of topic or plagiaristic will be rejected. 

Step-4: Peer Review 
EEIC uses double-blind system for Peer-Review; both reviewers' and authors' identities remain anonymous. Each manuscript will be reviewed by at least 2-3 experts in related field: one editorial staff member as well as one to three external reviewers. The review process takes about 1-2 weeks. 

Step-5: Result  
The review result is based on the suggestions of the reviewers. If reviewers have different opinion on manuscript, the editor will make a balanced decision based on all comments, or a second round of peer-review may be initiated.   

Guidelines for AI Tools

Any behavior involving the manipulation or fabrication of data generated by AI violates academic integrity and may lead to serious ethical issues. If the author has used AI tools and large language models, they must clearly state in the article's acknowledgments section that the following information is provided: the full name and version of the AI tools used, the specific usage method, and the prompt used. 

Limitations on the Reasonable Use of GenAI Tools: GenAI tools cannot be used to initiate an original research project without human guidance, nor can they be used to complete the entire research process of writing a paper. GenAI tools should only serve as auxiliary tools and cannot replace the author in conducting independent academic research. Additionally, GenAI tools cannot be listed as authors of the paper, as they do not possess the capability to create knowledge or assume academic responsibility. COPE has already provided detailed guidance on this matter, which is available here:[COPE Position Statement on AI and Authorship]